#Lrb m14 vs scar17 update#

This is why I will stick to the AK system where practical since that is what I already own rather than searching for the Excalibur rifle and ending up with every major system under the sun and winding up a jack of all rifles, but a master of none.

#Lrb m14 vs scar17 update#

Become the expert in one and then branch out and see how you can apply your experience to others and see what changes you need to make for a different system and so on.Sort of like an update to the saying of 'beware of the man with one gun because he will probably be able to shoot it very well'. They switch from system to system without putting the work in on any particular one to get well versed in it before moving on to the next 'hot ticket'. That is probably one of the biggest mistakes I see people make. IMO, they are all viable systems with pros and cons and I would pick one and learn it before moving to another system. It's because their recoil systems are all different gas piston on the M14 and FAL, gas impingment on the AR, and delayed blowback on the PTR. The AR and FAL perceived recoil is less to me than the M14 and the PTR. In my experience the recoil in them is the same but different, none of them are obnoxious. 308 guns have less apparent recoil which should be a factor to consider? I know that a mini-14 seems to 'kick' more than an AR15. I'll probably get me a PTR before the end of the year it's been a while since I've ran one and would like to get some more time on them.Am correct in assuming that the AR pattern. It's nitpicking on my part and a preference based decision I wouldn't cry if I had to use an HK/PTR based weapon. Buying a PTR91 GI gives you more options, but as a lefty I prefer the FAL over the HK platform only because of the throw of the safety. You're right the 308AR isn't standardized, but buying from a quality company built on an SR25 pattern lower gives you some options. IMO, the stocks, bolts, barrels, gas blocks, op rods and triggers are mehhh which leaves me with a receiver at that point I might as well have SEI build me one for $3000-$3500 or go with one of my other options which is what I chose to do. IMO, the Springfield M1As take too much work and money to get them up to something I would like to see in the weapon. For less than the price of any of those I can get a LaRue or LMT 308 or 2-3 PTR91 GIs or at least 2 FALs. The quality of the commercial parts is market lackluster for the most part until you start looking at SEI, LRB and Fulton. The GI parts for the M14 are pretty much dried up save a few parts and pieces you can piecemeal together. Please stop spouting disinformation if you're woefully ignorant.Here is my reasoning. You don't know what you're talking about. Same, the M1 and M1A I have experience with are very smooth and rugged rifles.ДЇor someone who has never even held an M-14 you sure can spew some third-hand disinformation. I'm more than a little sure whoever told you that is wrong.

That is unbelievably, inexcusably crappy, with any firearms that it's safe to to let the bolt slam forward on an empty chamber, you SHOULD do so as part of a function check, and IMO any firearm that you can F*** it up by performing a very basic, and significant part of a typical, prudent function check, is not a battle worthy weapon.

Extremely awkward and overly complicated design, heavy, and compared to the AR or SCAR, it is a primitive and obsolete design, not to mention less modular, (almost not at all.) and although I've never held an M14/M1 type rifle, I've heard that ergonomics are piss-poor compared to the AR or SCAR.Д®TA And another thing, I've heard that M1/M-14 rifles it is unsafe to let the bolt slam forward on an empty chamber, that it will damage it in a way that could make it explode when fired. I would say SCAR 17, only because you said you want to use optics, Personally I would like an AR-10B, but it has a carry handle upper, and would not be as well suited for use with optics.ДЄnything but an M-14 IMNSHO.